When Lito (episode 5, “Art and Religion” in “Sense8”, a Netflix series) forgetting his role as a rude character in a Mexican movie began to shed tears, he explained to the director that his grief was caused by the realization that “all beauty is temporary.” *
This is a common enough sentence: mourning about the transience of life and beauty has been expressed by countless poets and writers over the centuries. Why was I reminded of Nabokov just then? The scene belongs to a set of little comic mishaps contrasting with the director’s search for “realism,” something that he believed could be reached by filming the wanton destruction of an enormous collection of priceless archeological sculptures. Everything seemed to be disjointed and ludicrous in it. Why Nabokov?commentaries: Lito is "part of the episode’s most outwardly comedic story line.... [He] breaks down crying ...telling the director that in the moment he realized the fleeting nature of beauty...The whole scene is played for laughs, and while a man going through hormonal swings brought on by a period could be very base humor, it works here, mostly due to how evocative and unhinged Miguel Ángel Silvestre’s performance is." http://www.ew.com/recap/sense8-season-1-episode-5
**- VN had no access to the comforts of religion, such as the Jesuit poet’s G.M.Hopkins (now I have in mind “Spring and Fall” that ends with “It ís the blight man was born for. It is Margaret you mourn for”, cf. http://www.bartleby.com/122/31.html ). In his annotated copy of Kafka’s “The Metamorphosis” we read: “The soul has died with Gregor; the healthy young animal takes over. The parasites have fattened themselves on Gregor.” However, this personal lamentation doesn’t show in the body of his lecture, which he ends with a very objective paragraph: “You will mark Kafka's style. Its clarity, its precise and formal intonation in such striking contrast to the nightmare matter of his tale. No poetical metaphors ornament his stark black-and-white story. The limpidity of his style stresses the dark richness of his fantasy. Contrast and unity, style and matter, manner and plot are most perfectly integrated.”
Google Search the archive |
Contact the Editors |
NOJ | Zembla | Nabokv-L Policies |
Subscription options | AdaOnline | NSJ Ada Annotations | L-Soft Search the archive | VN Bibliography Blog |
All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.