I read it but is it a poor tattered take-off


-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Mylnikov <vmylnikov@YAHOO.COM>
To: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
Sent: Thu, May 24, 2012 9:57 pm
Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] SIGHTING: Signs & Symbols in New Yorker story

honestly i don't think it is worth reading - i have read two paragraphs - plagiarizm plus "takeoff" should be better than the original but Lorrie Moore is obviously not
thanks for posting
vladimir m

From: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@HOLYCROSS.EDU>
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:55 PM
Subject: [NABOKV-L] SIGHTING: Signs & Symbols in New Yorker story
There's a "takeoff" (or reflection on) in today's (May 28, 2012) The New Yorker by Lorrie Moore in the fiction section on VN's famous story "Signs and Symbols." I only read the first sentence of the Lorrie Moore story so far (and looked at the picture/illustration) and realized it.
The Lorrie Moore story is attached (I have not read it yet).
 
Barrie
Barrie Karp, Ph.D., Philosophy
barriekarp@gmail.comNew York City!
Google Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal" Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options Visit AdaOnline View NSJ Ada Annotations Temporary L-Soft Search the archive
All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.
Google Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal" Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options Visit AdaOnline View NSJ Ada Annotations Temporary L-Soft Search the archive

All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.