The current fashion of listing the 10 or 100 Best films, hotels, photos,
books may sometimes bring susprises to its users. A few years ago I brought
up "The little black book BOOKS" edited by Lucy Daniel (Cassell Illustrated),
because its cover held "Lolita" (with Kubrick's glasses and a lollipop) and
carried news about Nabokov, among the announced "a century of the greatest
books, writers, characters, passages and events that rocked the literary world."
This time I got the 2006 "501 Must-Read Books" by Bounty Books, in a 2011
Brazilian edition referring to "Larousse."
A desultory look led me to Nabokov's name in two distinct chapters.
The first one is "Memoirs" (selected by Denise Imwold) with St.Augustine's
"Confessions", Simone de Beauvoir's "Memoirs d'une jeune-fille rangée"",
Roal Dahl's "Tales of Childhood"; Helen Hanff's "84mCharing Cross Road",
Herzen's "Childhood, Youth and Exile"...and with Nabokov's "Speak,Memory" ( I
found, among other recommended works by VN: The Luzhin Defense, Laughter in
the Dark, Ada or Ardor, Terra Incognita, Lolita, Pale Fire, Details of a
Sunset and other short-stories, Strong Opinions).
The second is under
"Modern Fiction" (selected by Gabrielle Mander and Carola Campbell) and the
chosen novel is "Lolita." Other recommended works this time are listed as: The
REal Life of Sebastian Knight, Bend Sinister, Pnin, Pale Fire, Ada or Ardor,
Transparent Things, Look at the Harlequins and ("unfinished") The Original
of Laura.
[btw: my surprise derives from having learned about how
many authors and books were completely out of my range - probably
more than two-thirds of the "must-reads"! ]
........................................................................................................................................................................................
Sandy Klein sends a review by Larry Hardesty of B.
Boyd's "Stalking Nabokov"
http://bostonglobe.com/arts/2011/12/09/stalking-nabokov-brian-boyd/uUyG9LiHhGD6uYVqunzWoL/story.html In
his concluding remarks Hardesty affirms:"
'Stalking Nabokov' advances a
consistent and intriguing reading of his work. Boyd’s Nabokov is someone who
felt imprisoned both by the linearity of time and the insularity of his own
consciousness, and who saw fiction as a way to slip the bonds of both."
He also mentions the biographer's
"powerful corrective to a
prevailing view of Nabokov (1899-1977) as, for good or ill, a monger of visual
detail.’’ because for B.Boyd "
the telling Nabokovian detail is so
memorable precisely because it slices through a skein of narrative summary,
verbal gamesmanship, and first-person characterizations."
JM: Brian Boyd concludes that Nabokov feels
imprisoned by "the insularity of his own consciousness," a theme that
has recently popped up in the VN-L in connection to Bend
Sinister*.
Nevertheless, I still cannot figure out what that
expression, "insularity of
consciousness," means. Among the
regular analogies for the sensation of being imprisoned in
time, in space, by the body and by other physical limitations,
Pale Fire's bee-hive is particularly interesting: "Space is a swarming in the eyes; and time,/A singing in the ears.
In this hive I'm/Locked up." when we compare it to VN's paragraph in
SO: “When that slow-motion, silent explosion of love takes place in me,
unfolding its melting fringes and overwhelming me with the sense of something
much vaster, much more enduring and powerful than the accumulation of matter or
energy in any imaginable cosmos...I have to have all space and all time
participate in my emotion, in my mortal love, so that the edge of its mortality
is taken off, thus helping me to fight the utter degradation, ridicule, and
horror of having developed an infinity of sensation and thought within a finite
existence.”
These lines suggest
to me that for VN "consciousness" is related to the world of
sensations and his sense of imprisonment derives from a pungent awareness
of finitude. Does fiction remedy
that?
.............................................................................................................................
*- Colin
Tobin:"Was it not Nabokov's ultimate desire to
be able to escape the confines of one's singular consciousness, and enter into
others at will?"