JM: I was as puzzled as you by the
tendencious sweeping conclusions presented by Monica Maeckle, but I think
it's important that the Nab-L editorial policies remain open to divulge
"substandard" texts and facetious articles, since it is an Open Forum and
pertinent criticism, such as yours, may follow later and reset the
Nab-L perspective.
btw: an errata
related to a former message, about SKB's PSSA. Instead of "forking paths"
(unlike Borges & closer to Nabokov) I should have written "closer to
Robert Frost".
Nabokov's inclusion of "time-forks" seems to
indicate, at least, a third lane that would be unrelated to chance and
determinism.