>> while researching
Hyde's name, VN came across this similar word
Very
interesting!
Might I
remind however that VN, apart from being zoologically educated from his early
years, has been taking (reading I believe is the British wordJ)
ichthyology (fish science) at Cambridge, and tapeworms are a very big issue in
fish (we get most from them). What I am saying is that any average zoology
student or scholar (say, yours truly) would know the term “hydatid”
anyway.
Tapeworms of course have nothing
to do with botflies, both just being parasites.
See
attached (Obstetrics
& Gynecology, 1955, 6(2):219-220), a bizarre 1955 story of 53-year old
pregnant with mola hydatidosa. I wish VN saw it…Note that the author’s
institution is Rip Van Winkle Clinic!
From: Vladimir Nabokov
Forum [mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU] On Behalf Of Matthew Roth
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 8:50 AM
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: Parasites
All the recent
discussion of Botkin's relationship to Kinbote (and K's relationship to Shade),
brought me back to Carolyn Kunin's discussion of Jekyll & Hyde. Carolyn
pointed out the parasite theme in PF and related it to VN's lecture on
Stevenson, where he whimsically relates Hyde's name to hydatid, "a tiny
pouch within the body of man and other animals, a pouch containing a limpid
fluid with larval tapeworms in it--a delightful arrangement, for the little
tapeworms at least." VN's definition here is quite similar to the
definition in Webster's 2nd, so we can imagine that, while researching Hyde's
name, VN came across this similar word and noted the fitting connection.
It is apparent,
however, that VN's interest in parasites included more than just definitions in
the dictionary. When preparing to write PF, he must have looked up info on the
bot-fly, and in his 1964 Playboy interview, he provides a "little batch of
rejects" discarded during the writing of PF (recently noted by Jansy, I
believe). The last of these is a quote from The
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 48:558, describing the
undesirable nature of tapeworms, which "frequently crawl out of a person's
anal canal." I recently tracked down this fairly brief article,* thinking
that it perhaps included information on bot flies. It did not. To my surprise,
however, it does contain an extensive description of "hydatid
disease," which the author calls "one of the most serious parasitic
diseases of man." This raises a few questions. Did VN consider using a
tapeworm as the parasitic image in PF before settling on the bot-fly? Was he
led to this article by a card catalogue entry for "hydatid"? Does
this affirm Carolyn's assertion that VN had Jekyll & Hyde in mind when he
wrote PF? If so, why did he reject the use of these lines, or any reference to
tapeworms/hydatids? Was VN trying to give us a hint by including the reference
in his interview?
Matt
PS--Has the card
catalogue at the Cornell library been preserved? If so, that could be a
daunting, but perhaps revelatory research project for someone.
--------------------------
* "Animal
Parasites Transmissible to Man," by Willard H. Wright
All private editorial communications, without exception, are
read by both co-editors.