-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Botkin
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:03:06 -0400
From: Matthew Roth <mroth@messiah.edu>
To: <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>


JF wrote: "Kinbote's sporadic awareness that he's somehow connected to Botkin may be psychologically strange, but I think it's fine for fiction."

Jerry's observation (the psychological strangeness of Botkin's condition) has been too rarely acknowledged. The Index, written by Kinbote, seems to reveal not only that Kinbote actually is Botkin, but that Kinbote knows that he actually is Botkin. While a lot of critical ink has been spilled investigating the first revelation, it seem to me that the latter revelation is the more complex and interesting one. Unfortunately, I think it does some damage to the novel. If Kinbote knows that he is a delusion--knows it to the extent that he can reveal the truth in his Index--then he is not a delusion at all. Instead, he is nothing but a brilliant indulgence, a daydream of V. Botkin, who may be strange, but is not insane. For in order to be considered an alternate personality, the personality must believe in its own reality; personalities may be acquainted with other personalities, but they do not, to my knowledge, consider themselves less real than those other personalities. I don'!
t think we can get away with saying that Kinbote knows he is "somehow connected" to Botkin. The Index makes it very clear that he IS Botkin, and Kinbote must have known it when he wrote the entry. I suppose one could argue that he only came to the revelation while he was writing the Index, but there isn't any internal evidence to support that conclusion. Instead, we are left with the uncomfortable notion that Kinbote is just a pseudonym and Botkin is, as Shade is made to hint, a fellow poet, rather than VN's "madman." So here I think the logic of the novel departs from VN's intention. How, then, should we interpret the text--according to VN's intention (Botkin really is insane and Kinbote really believes in Zembla) or according to the text alone (Botkin knows, wishful thinking aside, that he is real and Kinbote is a fantasy). My readerly principles tell me I should stick to the text alone, but in practice I find myself acceding to the former choice, while considering the Bo!
tkin/Kinbote relationship a flaw in the overall design of the novel.


Matt Roth

I just thought of one other option: Kinbote believes that he is real and Botkin is his daydream. That is, in New Wye Kinbote sometimes goes around calling himself V. Botkin. But this possibility goes against VN's own comment that Botkin stands behind Kinbote, rather than vice-versa.








Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.