I am always astounded by the number of people who think that as a
tree grows, its branches go upwards instead of remaining where they
started. Anybody who has climbed the same tree for more than five
years can testify that the branches always remain where they
started,whether somebody hangs swings on them or not.
Chaz (who also knows more important things about that swing)
--- On Fri, 8/27/10, Jansy <jansy@AETERN.US> wrote: Bryson’s items on Halitosis, Psoriasis, Gillette, equivocal Edsel (I borrowed the book for a couple of minutes, only) suggest that Nabokov, in Montreux, chose a particular decade or two (twenties, thirties) for his “historical/actual” references. For a meticulous researcher as he, if this information proves to be correct, one might expect him to be pointing to something related to Shade’s emotional world. The poet’s love for Hazel always strikes me as false: if there’s any “pathos” it might be related to guilt feelings towards an event that would have happened long before the young woman committed suicide. Shade always returns to the sweet sentimental “swing” (a child’s plaything!), while he informs us that it hung from a tree which has grown considerably over the years. Were it not “a phantom swing” it would then be hanging from high up among the branches… This is why it has just occurred to me that Shade could be indicating a special period during his daughter’s infancy (describing dated adverts and returning over and over to a “phantom swing”). |