In response to Ron Rosenbaum's question, "Does anyone else believe
Hazel Shade's ghost somehow dictated 'Pale Fire'?":
Of course not, and Brian Boyd never made such a
silly claim. If you'll reread his "Nabokov's 'Pale Fire'," you'll see that
he makes an ingenious case, well supported by textual evidence, that Hazel
Shade's shade influences Kinbote's commentary in a number of complex and
significant areas.
And that Kinbote had told Shade at least some of what becomes the Zemblan parts of his commentary, which influenced the poem.
Perhaps the best way to put it is to employ Boyd's
phrase (on p. 168) -- Hazel "helps Kinbote dream" his dream of
Zembla.
There is never any suggestion that Hazel has
dictated anything. Boyd's argument, page after page, is always for
influence and pattern-making, never ghostwriting. Do I believe in this
interpretation? I certainly do. Anyone who doubts it needs to
counter Boyd's textual points, case by case; he is not offering a hunch,
but rather a sustained argument.
...
Okay.
Boyd makes two main arguments. The first is that Kinbote's supposedly
homosexual fantasy of Zembla spends much less time on homosexuality
(concise hints that he indulged in it in great quantity) than on "women
spurned": the allegedly comic episodes of Fleur de Fyler and Garh, and
the sentimental, guilt-ridden, occasionally comic episode of Disa.
Hazel was fatally spurned, and she had resemblances to another woman
mentioned in Zembla, Iris Acht. I do find it strange that Kinbote, a
paragon of self-centeredness and misogyny, says he resembles Hazel or
has time for compassion for Disa.
However, there are other
explanations even from Boyd's stance that most of what happens outside
Zembla is "real". What are Kinbote's similarities to Hazel? Beside a
tendency to reverse words, both have been rejected by boys and
men--Kinbote by the gardener, who won't or can't have sex with him; and
more ambiguously by Bob, who may or may not have had sex with him and
maybe purposely got himself kicked out of Kinbote's house. And Hazel
feels sure most males aren't sexually interested in her, while Kinbote
knows most males aren't sexually interested in him. Also, spending so
much time with the poem and admiring Shade so much could give him
sympathy for Hazel.
Although as Boyd says, we don't see Kinbote
rejecting any women, we know he would, and it isn't surprising that he
gives himself the opportunity to do so in his fantasies. But there are
hints that he has done so. The simplest reading of the problematic
passage about turning up "on another campus as an old, happy, healthy,
heterosexual Russian..." is that it's a portrait of his real identity,
Botkin. If Botkin became homosexual when he went crazy, he may in so
doing have rejected his wife or lady friend. Or if he didn't have one,
he certainly would have rejected the possibility. A possible hint is
that the only non-homoerotic poems he mentions liking are Frosts'
"Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" and Edsel Ford's "The Image of
Desire", both of which are about fulfilling one's responsibilities
despite temptation. Maybe the passages about Disa in "reality" are
based on his continued rejection of his wife or female lover; those
about his dreams of her, on the buried Botkin's feelings about
abandoning his responsibility to and love for her. I can't claim this
interpretation is certain, but I think it's as well justified as Boyd's
theory that Hazel in the afterlife is influencing him.
Boyd's
other argument is based on "uncanny coincidences between poem and
commentary". His many examples include Shade's waxwing (related to the
fictional bird named after his father) that crashed into a window and
King Charles's father who crashed his plane into "the scaffolding of a
huge hotel". He notes that Charles Nicol and Pekka Tammi suggested that
these are the result of the poem's influence on Kinbote as he writes
his commentary, but rejects this possibility since Kinbote recounted his
Zemblan delusions to Shade in the two months before Shade wrote
his poem. Instead, he suggests Kinbote inspired Shade; for instance,
Kinbote's story of his father's death would have reminded Shade of those
waxwings, which give him the most widely quoted part of his poem. This
is how Hazel indirectly inspired the poem--though I don't see that Boyd
says she knew about the waxwings and prompted Kinbote to include
something suggestive of them in Zembla.
The flaw is that Boyd
tacitly assumes that Kinbote's Zemblan stories have remained constant,
even to details, from when he tells them to Shade in May and June till
he writes his commentary in August, September, and October. We know,
though, that Kinbote can change his story in far less time than that.
He changes Gordon Krummholz's article of clothing four times as he
imagines Gordon talking with Gradus. Maybe more relevantly, he tells us
Disa's hair is "coal-black" and "ebony", but then says Shade's
description of Sybil, with "dark brown hair", is "a plain unretouched
likeness" of Disa. Before our eyes, he's changed his Zemblan fantasy to
make it resemble the poem. It's as if Nabokov were warning us not to
base our interpretation on his reliability about Zembla.
One exception is Timon of Athens. Kinbote's mentions of it (the
Zemblan edition he takes with him when he escapes, Phryne and Timandra
as names of the youths he dreams of betraying Disa with, and the
re-Englished passage) can't arise from its being the source of the title
"Pale Fire", since he doesn't know it's the source (unless he's joking
with us). However, he seems to have a copy of the play in translation
as the material for his re-Englishing, and this, not Hazel, may be the
reason for the other two mentions. It may even have led him to mention
it to Shade in a story of Zembla or elsewhere.
Of course, Kinbote
is one of the most unreliable narrators in literature, and I'd hardly
count on his ever having said anything about Zembla to Shade or anyone.
Finally,
Boyd argues that survival after death, namely Hazel's and Shade's,
makes sense of the book. I agree (against those who think it would ruin
part of the humor). But we already have evidence for it in the
will-o-the-wisp's message, and I agree with Boyd that the red admiral at
the end is a hint in the same direction. And that's plenty.