I'm coming late to the discussion (and haven't read all the posts on this question), so I apologize if this is a repeat of what someone else has said
However, I believe you also have to look at the function the missing last line fulfills in the novel as a whole. Namely, it allows Kinbote a "way in." --- On Fri, 5/14/10, Anthony Stadlen <STADLEN@AOL.COM> wrote: From: Anthony Stadlen <STADLEN@AOL.COM> Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] Fw: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4 To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU Date: Friday, May 14, 2010, 6:17 AM
In a message dated 13/05/2010 23:51:08 GMT Daylight Time, chtodel@COX.NET
writes:
Does it not seem apropos, that the missing final line (1000)
is intended to mark the ultimate indeterminacy of the afterlife issue?
It seems a fitting conclusion, no? Don
Johnson
That is indeed what I have been trying to suggest.
Anthony Stadlen
Anthony
Stadlen "Oakleigh" 2A Alexandra Avenue GB - London N22
7XE Tel.: +44 (0) 20 8888 6857 Email: stadlen@aol.com Founder in 1996 of the Inner
Circle Seminars: an ethical, existential, phenomenological search for truth in
psychotherapy. See "Existential Psychotherapy & Inner
Circle Seminars" at http://anthonystadlen.blogspot.com/
for coming seminars and complete archive of past Inner Circle Seminars
All private editorial communications, without
exception, are
read by both co-editors.
|