On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Jansy <jansy@aetern.us> wrote:
Jerry Friedman [to JM's  "I'd always thought that the squat and frog-eyed emerald case (line 238) had been a cicada's  but the empty hulk was found in cold March, on the day Hazel died. This suggested to me  that this insect had recently emerged from it: is it possible?]  I doubt it.  The "case" would have lasted from the previous year, which I think is possible.
 
JM: There are two notes ( to lines 181-182 with the birthday July-cicada singing, and to line 238) where Kinbote employs a curious "present tense," in both cases.  In the first one, he emphasizes the closeness of Shade's "waxwing/cicada,": "The bird of lines 1-4 and 131 is again with us. It will reappear in the ultimate line of the poem; and another cicada, leaving its envelope behind, will sing triumphantly at lines 236-244." For line 238, he'll describe the envelope left on a tree trunk by an adult cicada and, while he mentions Lafontaine he adds: "The cigale’s companion piece, the ant, is about to be embalmed in amber."
 
From Kinbote's point of view, the cicada (in 238) has just emerged, inspite of the sleety March day and, somehow, it also sings! 

Okay, I see.  The cicada is probably dead, so Shade's "alive the song" was probably not true even when he saw the molted integument.  Thanks!  I hadn't noticed that.

However, when animals are used as images of survival after death (snakes shedding their skin, butterfly metamorphosis), the animal's eventual death usually isn't taken as weakening the image.  Both the ant and the cicada's shell are stuck to the tree; the ant died there and the cicada flew away and sang (for a while).  There might be some enjoyable irony in the fact that the cicada is just as dead as the ant now.

For more literalism, only the male cicadas sing, so there's at least a 50 percent chance that the cicada that left its shell on the tree never sang anyway (assuming cicadas have equal numbers of males and females).

Kinbote's present tense strikes (there's an example) me as normal in talking about literature.  If I can see any importance in it, it's that he could be revitalizing the moribund trope of the poet immortalizing his subject.  Not only did the cicada sing after molting, it's still alive and singing in Shade's poem in some sense.  Maybe.

The Wikiparticle has a primitive but evocative photographic animation of a Tibicen cicada (the most common genus in North America) molting and flying away.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicadidae

It doesn't seem to me that he is considering the "cigale-fourmi" of the fable ( or "fabulating"), but finding himself in agreement with Shade that "dead is the mandible, alive the song."* (whose restauration is it? Hazel's? Shade's own?)  
 
...

..........................................
* Somehow I see a link with this line and CK's two variants, set down in a note to line 596: "Should the dead murderer try to embrace/ His outraged victim whom he now must face?"  and, later, line 895:  "In nature’s strife when fortitude prevails/The victim falters and the victor fails." Yes, reader, Pope."

Also Kinbote's "anti-Darwinian aphorism: The one who kills is always his victim's inferior."?  Because they all challenge commonsense?

Jerry Friedman

Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.