-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re:PF and Parody--response to JF
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:15:59 -0500
From: Matthew Roth <mroth@messiah.edu>
To: <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>



Jerry,
You asked whether or not VN's parodies ever employ "bad writing" in something the length of "PF." I say yes...and no. You could argue that Despair is a whole novel of "bad writing." Hermann thinks he is a masterful storyteller, but his narrative is constantly escaping his control. So we could say that the book as a whole is a parody of the solipsistic artist, or the artist who can't tell art from life, as some have put it. Likewise, Kinbote's commentary is "bad writing" in the sense that, like Hermann's tale, it has escaped his own intentions, as well as our readerly expectations for scholarly work. In both cases, however, this "bad writing" is brilliantly written! It's VN's greatest trick, in my opinion. But if "PF" is a parody (I don't think it is) then it is of a different order. Instead of the wildly entertaining parodies we get in the works of Hermann and Kinbote, we get a 999-line poem that is...what exactly? Plodding? Mildly dull? Clunky? VN loves to show us bad writi!
ng, but he never does so without making us laugh. If, as BB argues, VN was in competition with Eliot's Four Quartets, I think he lost the fight, but I think the poem is still a great accomplishment on its own, and it's even more brilliant in the context of the whole novel.

Those who wonder whether VN contemplated publishing the poem separately should know that he did try to sell it to Esquire, prior to the publication of the novel. Esquire turned him down, saying that they didn't publish poetry.

Best,
Matt


Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.