Yesterday I quoted some lines (949-952):written by Shade and realized they are among my favourite ones in PF ( I'm usually not very fond of Shade...)
You too are
there, beneath the word, above
The
syllable, to underscore and stress
The vital rhythm.
Then I noticed that these verses had been parodied, or their idea perversely stolen and inverted by C.Kinbote who, in his note to line 17, wrote: "We shall accompany Gradus in constant thought[...], through the entire length of the poem, following the road of its rhythm, riding past in a rhyme, skidding around the corner of a run-on, breathing with the caesura [...] hiding between two words [...] steadily marching nearer in iambic motion[...], boarding a new train of thought[...] while Shade blots out a word, and falling asleep as the poet lays down his pen for the night [...] Kinbote also uses the same image in note 131 (on the return of a waxwing slain): "The force propelling him is the magic action of Shade’s poem itself, the very mechanism and sweep of verse, the powerful iambic motor. Never before has the inexorable advance of fate received such a sensuous form..."
Shade's love ( for Sybil?) recognizes in her physical and mental presence a signal of a "vital rythm". Kinbote's jealousy towards Sybil, and Shade, propels him along with Gradus' iambic motor to entrap Shade. Words of love and life, words of hate and death...
This led me next to Kinbote's commentary on line 596 (he'd
indicated in the corpus of his note 17): "We all know those dreams in which something Stygian soaks through and
Lethe leaks in the dreary terms of defective plumbing [...] I hope the reader
will feel something of the chill that ran down my long and supple spine when I
discovered this variant:
Should the dead murderer try to
embrace
His outraged victim whom he now must
face?
Do objects have a soul? Or perish
must
Alike great temples and Tanagra
dust?