Please explain the phrase "morally anaerobic", it makes no sense to me.
This book doesn't require oxygen for its morals?

Emily


On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 5:52 PM, John Minervini <john.minervini@gmail.com> wrote:

As regards Humbert's remorse: my criticism was not that Will (Evison's protagonist) should, like Humbert, feel shame.  Rather, I merely suggest that Will's actions should be considered in their moral dimension.  As it stands, the book is morally anaerobic, which (I think) is irresponsible.

As regards being derivative: I have no trouble with Evison's borrowing or writing in a mould - but he needs, at least, to add something original, something of interest, differentiate himself.  He does not.

John Minervini




--
An overcivilized people grow complacent and careless and leave the door open for a tribe of fanatical savages, through a mixture of luck, treachery, and the foulest inhumanity, to usurp their place for a few years.
-Richard Adams, "Shardik", 1974
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.