Why not point out that the vane is stiff? Some weathervanes wear down their shafts and become loose, veering with every breeze. Some rust solid. Others not so far gone move occasionally but stiffly.

Why bring the Vane Sisters in here? When VN wants to allude to them in later work, he does so in no uncertain terms.

Why naive and gauzy? Only a naive person repeats all the programs she has heard. Northern mockingbirds do have a gauzy sheen to the plumage on their backs.

And if you want to connect Hazel with this passage, Pale Fire does it for you: the pre-echoes of "the phantom of my little daughter's swing" and "TV's huge paperclip" in the poem "The Swing" in note 61, with its "TV's giant paperclips" and "The empty little swing . . . That breaks my heart"; and the fact that Shade and Sybil watch TV on the night of Hazel's death, a night of viewing that cruelly juxtaposes an advertisement for a beauty product and a glimpse of Marilyn Monroe with homely Hazel; as Matt notes, Sybil as "tender mockingbird" calls out to Shade, between the ad and the preview of Marilyn Monroe), to come down to the TV; the femininity of the mockingbird on the TV aerial "flirting her tail aloft / Or gracefully indulging in a soft / Upward hop-flop" (is it accidental that the first phrase brings Monroe to my mind?) adds to the contrast with the awkward, taciturn Hazel these lines already evoke.

Why work so circuitously to make a connection that the novel itself makes directly--unless you feel you need to get, by stepping stones you have imported and moved into position, to the story of Tereus and Philomel?

Brian Boyd

-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Matthew Roth
Sent: Wed 9/07/2008 2:35 AM
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: Shade's Mockingbird

Jansy quoted a bit of Shade's poem the other day:

                                                  ... the stiff vane so often visited
                                                  By the naïve, the gauzy mockingbird
                                                  Retelling all the programs she had heard;
                                                  Switching from chippo-chippo to a clear
                                                  To-wee, to-wee; then rasping out: come here,
                                                  Come here, come herrr'; flirting her tail aloft,
                                                  Or gracefully indulging in a soft
                                                  Upward hop-flop, and instantly (to-wee!)
                                            70   Returning to her perch * the new TV.

It so happens that I've been thinking about this very passage quite a bit. Some thoughts:

1. Why point out that the vane is "stiff"? Are some vanes droopy? It seems like an entirely superfluous adjective. If VN needed something there for meter's sake, he could have as easily chosen a color or another, more useful, pathetic modifier. Given this, I can't help thinking that "stiff" is a pun, pointing us to the slang usage which means "corpse." This doesn't make sense in the context of "PF," but if we relate "vane" to Cynthia and Sybil Vane (two stiffs by the end of the story) then perhaps we begin to make something of this otherwise odd image.

2. Why is the mockingbird naive and gauzy? Is it because she simply repeats, without discretion, whatever she has heard? She has no inner life that would drive her to sing her own song?

3. Why is the mockingbird female? Since there is no discernible difference in the appearance of male and female mockingbirds, Shade must have arbitrarily decided that his subject was female. Or perhaps he thinks of it as female because, in line 422, he calls Sybil his "tender mockingbird." Sybil, like the real mockingbird, is engaged with the new TV at the time this name is used.

4. What to make of the transcription of the bird's song? Why to-wee? Why Come here, come herrr'? Mockingbirds can sing most any song, so Shade is not borrowing some standard transcription of the mockingbird's song.

This is speculative, of course, but my own feeling is that this mockingbird is none other than Hazel Shade. Brian Boyd has made, I think, a pretty convincing case that Hazel returns as the Red Admirable at the end of the poem, and that the ring-necked pheasant ("sublimated grouse") is likewise a version of the dingy cygnet-to-wood duck transformation associated with Hazel. If Hazel is the Vanessa and the pheasant, might she not also be this mockingbird? Certain elements seem to fit:

A. The invocation of the Vane Sisters suddenly makes a lot more sense. Like them, Hazel is attempting to contact the living from the beyond.

B. This explains why the mockingbird is a female.

C. Hazel appears in the form of a pet name John gives to Sybil. We have already seen this in the case of the Vanessa, where Shade calls Sybil his "dark Vanessa, crimson barred, my blest  / My Admirable butterfly." (270-71)  My own belief is that Hazel is trying to, in a sense, replace her mother, to become the object of her father's affection. Therefore, she embodies the amatory metaphors John uses to describe Sybil.

D. To-wee and Come here, come herrr (but not chippo, as far as I can tell) can be read as words from Hazel to her father. To-wee becomes "two, we" (we two) and Come here, come herrr becomes a plea for attention and a play on Shade's name, which is, in Spanish, "almost man," just as herr, in German, means "mister." (I won't go into the possible association with Hermann Karlovich). Just as the Vanessa, in a "frightening imitation of conscious play," tries to communicate with Shade, and just as the pheasant seems to leave a coded message for him, so too does the mockingbird (with increasing, raspy desperation, try to grab Shade's attention.

E. If we accept that Hazel may be taking the form both of the pheasant and the mockingbird, a curious family unit snaps into view. As Jerry Friedman helpfully informed me (off-list), the northern mockingbird was often, especially in the 19th century, called the American nightingale (because of its musicality and propensity for singing at night). So then: Shade is a waxwing, Sybil a swallow (hirondelle), and Hazel a nightingale/pheasant. As far as I know, this arrangement has only one precedent: the myth of Tereus, Procne, Philomel, and Itys.  As Ovid tells it, Tereus was married to Procne, with whom he had a son, Itys. But Tereus lusted after Procne's sister, Philomel. He eventually raped her, imprisoned her, and cut out her tongue. But Philomel hid a message in the weave of a tapestry that she managed to get into the hands of Procne. When Procne found out what happened, she rescued Philomel and they together, in a rash act of revenge, slaughtered Itys and served him as a meal to Tereus. When Tereus found out, he chased the sisters into the forest, where the Gods intervened, changing Tereus into a crested bird with a mask on its face (in early translations a "lapwing"), Procne into a swallow, and Philomel into a nightingale. Some versions of the myth say that Itys was reassembled into a pheasant. It isn't hard to see the similarities here. Shade, like Tereus, is a crested bird with a mask (whose name, waxwing, is phonetically similar to lapwing); Sybil, like Procne, is a swallow; and Hazel, like Philomel, is a (American) nightingale, while also doubling the role of Itys, a pheasant.

As you may have guessed, I believe that this is no mere coincidence, and I likewise believe that it supports a reading of the novel wherein there is some kind of unnatural relationship (active or passive) between John Shade and Hazel. In Ovid, it is very clear that Tereus's relationship with Philomel is seen as a form of incest, and the father's devouring of his child is simply an alimentary form of incest. Note too that in one scene in the Metamorphoses, Tereus, while witnessing Philomel embracing her father (the king), wishes that he were her father, so that he could indulge his passion incestuously. (Shade, by the way, twice imagines himself a king in "PF"--see lines 605 and 894; in the latter of these, he, like Kinbote, imagines himself both as a king and as the victim of an assassin.)

We can now also note another link to Eliot's "Game of Chess," which Shade (or Nabokov) parodies in Canto Three. Just before the "What is that noise?" bit, Eliot shows us the mantle with its "carved dolphin," where a picture displays,
                  As though a window gave upon the sylvan scene
                        The change of Philomel, by the barbarous king
                        So rudely forced; yet there the nightingale
                        Filled all the desert with inviolable voice
                        And still she cried, and still the world pursues,
                        'Jug Jug' to dirty ears.
Brian Boyd has argued that VN was also parodying the first section of "A Game of Chess," (a woman before toilet items), so this adds one more piece to that puzzle, as well.

Those who may not be familiar with what I've written about this up to now, should see here:
http://listserv.ucsb.edu/lsv-cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0710&L=nabokv-l&T=0&O=D&P=66
http://listserv.ucsb.edu/lsv-cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0710&L=nabokv-l&P=7575
http://listserv.ucsb.edu/lsv-cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0709&L=nabokv-l&P=2684

Best,
Matt Roth



Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en

Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com

Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/









Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.