-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] M. Krimmel on Blue
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:20:00 -0500
From: Mary Bellino <iambe@rcn.com>
Reply-To: iambe@rcn.com
To: Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
References: <45DF4ED8.1040404@utk.edu>


Just for the record, I actually wrote the paragraph Mary
attributes to Don, when I addressed Mary's question the first
time she posted it. My two responses are here

http://listserv.ucsb.edu/lsv-cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0505&L=nabokv-l&D=0&T=0&P=3574&F=P

and here

http://listserv.ucsb.edu/lsv-cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0505&L=nabokv-l&T=0&O=D&F=P&P=4982

although I no longer believe Rutherford-Dyer's thesis makes
sense. I still recommend the Irwin book though. There is also an
interesting digital book available here

www.library.umass.edu/benson/jbgc.html

and a promising-looking abstract (specifically mentions blue,
although I believe it deals primarily with modern Greek), of an
article in the journal Perception, here

ww.perceptionweb.com/abstract.cgi?id=v010010

Mary Bellino



Mary Krimmel wrote:

>and from Don Johnson,

>. . .The theory that the Greeks lacked words for certain colors
...(propounded first I believe by Julian Jaynes) is considered
to be
pretty far-fetched. The classical Greeks, as opposed to those of
Homer's time, certainly had a word for blue, kuanous, the same
as our word cyan...The whole spectrum of Greek colors is by no
means a congruent match with our conceptions of what is meant by
the same color-words.<




Search the Nabokv-L archive with Google

Contact the Editors

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.

Visit Zembla

View Nabokv-L Policies