-------- Original Message --------
Somewhere in Strong Opinions, I recall, VN reveals that his research
into
Dreams was motivated, inter alia, by a desire to dispute the sex-centric
dream-theories of the Viennese 'witch doctor.' Frankly, I find the
detailed,
earnest narration of most folks' dreams the ultimate narcissistic YAWN,
being beyond verification or useful (this includes 'entertaining')
analysis.
An obvious exception would be when VN describes his 'real' dreams with
his
uniquely gifted narrative skills -- these, as Jansy and Stephen Brook
indicate, we can read with the same pleasure we derive from the
'invented'
dreams of his novels & poetry.
A childhood quip (Spike Milligan?) added to my life-long distrust of
dreamy
interpretations:
"Last night I dreamt I was being chased by a tiger, and only today I
lost my
fountain pen."
The TIMES (of London) reports a shock-horror' Freudian scandal. Proof
of
the rumours (spread by Jung and others) that Herr Doktor was indeed
shagging
his sister-in-law. Two-timing Siggy tells a rather dumb lie, signing in
(single room?) as Doktor and MRS Freud on a recently-uncovered Swiss
Hotel
register! Why not use Mr/Mrs Schmidt in the time-honoured
motel-adulterer's
tradition?? The author of Lolita would have enjoyed the incident. Did
Siggy
agonize over how to register his illicit paramour? See p. 122 -- HH's
telegram -- was he Humbert, Homberg, Hamberg -- was he with his
daughter or
'immature girl' etc?
Stan Kelly-Bootle
>> mixed with day-dreams, reminiscences and hallucinations, as we
find
>> in ADA...
>>
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm