Dear List,
I only realized today that the murder of Shade by Gradus/Gray had been
announced in the very first lines of his poem when the
poet, posthumously ( "I was the shadow... slain" ), notes, that he
also was "ashen fluff" ( an ash gray powdery bundle)...
Quite surprising to
discover how slow a reader I am.
I followed an old exchange in one of the internet discussion groups
where the participants were chatting about "the overt and almost startling
appearance of the Joycean artist paring his finger nails at the end of Bend Sinister".
The discussants also pointed out how, in VN's novels, "our perceptions
of reality are being carefully limited and directed by an overseeing stage
manager. We are not to believe that the characters have any reality beyond the
mind of their creator."
In Pale Fire the "pared nails" arise as worded by John
Shade (lines 185-186)
"I stand before the window and I pare / My fingernails
and vaguely am aware" - or, "And so I pare my nails, and muse, and
hear" ( line 245). And yet, when asked by Alfred Appel about this apparent
allusion to Joyce, VN replied: "Neither Kinbote nor Shade, nor their maker,
is answering Joyce in "Pale Fire". Actually, I never liked "A
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man". I find it a feeble and garrulous
book. The phrase you quote is an unpleasant coincidence." ("Strong
Opinions", 70-71).
( NB: Joyce's words were: " The artist, like the God of the creation,
remains within or behind or beyond or above his handiwork, invisible, refined
out of existence, indifferent, paring his fingernails." In A Portrait of the
Artist as a Youn Man, chap. V, page 245, Penguin Books, 1996)
Despite the comings and goings what I wanted to discuss was the idea
about the omniscient author in his ivory (or ivy) tower, here
taken in the controling sense of the "model-author" as described
by Umberto Eco in relation to a "model-reader" (following his
slightly difference with Wolfgand Iser. Cf. "Six Walks in the Fictional
Woods",Norton Lectures, 1994: Chapter One) - as suggesting not
G.M Hopkins, not Eliot, not even Joyce - but arising as a
consequence of the marvelous blend of voices and unreliable narrators
misleading the readers.
Following Bentham's architectural plans for a "Panopticon" I'm
actually suggesting that both characters and readers in "Pale Fire" are
isolated in their private cells. They only interact thorugh the
discrete commands that issue from the central tower in the "Grim Pen
prison" where the eternal Author remains invisible. They may sink and die
in Grimpenmire, but some of them survive to discuss one thing or another in a VN
List...
Jansy