"I cannot agree with you that "Lolita was the real thing"  because I believe,
like Freud, that there is no such "real thing"  except the "real loss" of a
"some-thing" that always haunts every one of us and which Nabokov could render
in such a taunting heartbreaking way in almost all his novels."
Jansey,

Jansey,

I too believe in the real loss of a something that haunts us, but I tend to consider it more in the terms of  Wordsworth, vide 'Intimations of Immortality,', than in a Freudian  sense. I believe that, one day, one regains that portion of one's self, which I think has something to do with what people have called a soul, or that you regain your place in the something-that-was, which is not in this world. This is the way I tend to consider Pale Fire. I think, in an amazing way, Pale Fire is the one novel, one of very few  works of art, that come close to expressing what I FEEL (and I make a strong and deliberate distinction here between what I think and what I feel, since my thoughts tend to reject this) may be the  answer to the puzzle of existence.

Andrew Brown

----------
From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
Sent:   Thursday, March 17, 2005 6:06 PM
To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject:        Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

<<File: ATT2148667.htm>>




----- Forwarded message from jansy@aetern.us -----
    Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:09:53 -0300
    From: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
Reply-To: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
 Subject: Re:      Re: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?




RE:  Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?Andrew,

You described what I meant and was unable to put into so many words ( actually,
not that many!):" memories that come unbidden" instead of "specific memories
that are sought but not obtained". But your observation that these memories are
 "often unwelcome" adds a Freudian dimension that I didn´t find in Proust´s
elaborations.
I think that what HH sought was not a specific memory -  but that  he did seek a
specific state of mind that could lead him into the experience of an "aesthetic
bliss".
You wrote, in the end of your note: "until the fateful day he winds up in
Ramsdale. And there he finds the real thing, of which Annabel was merely
simulacrum".
I cannot agree with you that "Lolita was the real thing"  because I believe,
like Freud, that there is no such "real thing"  except the "real loss" of a
"some-thing" that always haunts every one of us and which Nabokov could render
in such a taunting heartbreaking way in almost all his novels.

Jerrie Friedman wrote beautifully about his reading of "Pale Fire" and shared
his vision with us where  a "red admiral" became "the" thing. But Friedman also
implied a level of apprehension like Taoist Chuang Tzu´s story about having
dreamt that he was a butterfly and upon awakening finding himself not as
certain as he´d been about who he was: a Chuang Tzu person ? A butterfly
dreaming Chuang Tzy? ( i.e: are dreams more real than our conscious vigil-state
sense of "I am"?  )

Thinking about movies and Ada, there would never be " a one only real
translation/transposition" of VN´s novel. That´s not what movies are about (
"transpositions" ), I think.
Concerning "Lolita", for example, film-critic Richard Corliss wrote about
Kubrick´s achievement saying that Nabokov had written a extravagantly cinematic
screen-play that could only exist on the printed page and  Adrian Lyne's
screen-writer, Stephen Schiff, argued that Kubrick's movie tended more to a
Quilty than to a Lolita.
Schiff  viewed "Lolita" not as a mere book, but as a jig-saw puzzle, and, in
transposing it into film he intended "to write a movie that an audience could
take in entirely the first time; I hope that we have achieved something like
the effect Nabokov intends after several readings, though our means are
entirely different (...) attempting to translate into a kind of exciting sign
language - the language of the film - what one of the century's greatest
masters of prose rendered so incomparably on the page".    Interviewed by
Suellen Stringer-Hye(www.libraries.psu.edu/iasweb/nabokov/schiffl.htm)

What is "really" Ada? Where is the "real Lolita"?
Jansy





----- Forwarded message from as-brown@comcast.net -----
    Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:57:34 -0500
    From: Andrew Brown <as-brown@comcast.net>
Reply-To: Andrew Brown <as-brown@comcast.net>
 Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?Jansey,

It seems to me more that Proust's involuntary memory meant memories that come
unbidden, often unwelcome, more so than specific memories that are sought but
not obtained. Proust's characters are more often engulfed in memories,
overpowered by them. The involuntary action is memory's abundance. But from the
moment Humbert reports Annabel's death in Corfu, he can fairly easily, and
coldbloodedly, proceed without much of a backward glance for her. The passage
in which HH writes his ironic essay is in the period when he also writes his
fleshless (and stillborn) pastiche, and hangs out at the Deux Magot, and
basically lives as a banal left bank cliche. He admits to being an artiste
manque which also supports my idea about the idleness of his essay. The
nympholeptic contact has him in thrall, and he is less pining for the past than
he is muddling toward a future, through a string of desultory adventures, until
the fateful day he winds up in Ramsdale. And there he finds the real thing, of
which Annabel was merely simulacrum.

Andrew Brown




  ----- Forwarded message from jansy@aetern.us -----
      Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:15:27 -0300
      From: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
  Reply-To: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
   Subject: Re:      Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?




  I haven´t read any but one of Keats´ letters ( with the much quoted
description
  of "negative capability" - which all Nabokovians must cultivate anyway ) but
  I´ve always been intrigued by Nabokov´s project of having everything under
  control in his conscious mind yielding complete and free access to his
  remembrances. No slip without glitter and glide.

  And yet one of the intriguing aspects of Proust´s theory about memory and his
  examples comes from the fact that Proust refers to  an "involuntary memory".
  There is a wonderful essay on Proust written by Samuel Beckett where he was
able
  to count only six or seven epiphanies in Proust´s entire oeuvre.

  I was wondering if, instead of joining the chuckling scholars, HH was hiding a
  disappointment at his not being able to conjure up Annabel Lee as often as he
  desired. If his memory, like the Proustian, remained "involuntary" ...




    ----- Forwarded message from Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com -----
        Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:38 -0500
        From: "Brown, Andrew" <Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com>
    Mike,

    Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
    suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article
    had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
    article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
    prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was
among
    the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

    Andrew Brown






    > ----------
    > From:         Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
    > Reply To:     Vladimir Nabokov Forum
    > Sent:         Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
    > To:   NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
    > Subject:      Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?
    >
    > Dear List,
    >
    > A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
    > wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
    > Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
    > but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
    > that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific Keats
    > passage that H.H. might be referring to?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Mike Donohue
    >
    > ----- End forwarded message -----
    >
    >




    This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
  confidential
    or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from
any
    disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.  Please be
aware
    that such actions are prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in
    error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
    helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

    ----- End forwarded message -----





  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    Mike,

    Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
  suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his article
  had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
  article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
  prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was among
  the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

    Andrew Brown







      ----------
      From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
      Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
      Sent:   Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
      To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      Subject:        Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

      Dear List,

      A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
      wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
      Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
      but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
      that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific Keats
      passage that H.H. might be referring to?

      Thanks,
      Mike Donohue

      ----- End forwarded message -----





          This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
  confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
  refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.
  Please be aware that such actions are prohibited. If you have received this
  transmission in error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
  helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

  ----- End forwarded message -----





------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  Andrew,

  I haven´t read any but one of Keats´ letters ( with the much quoted
description of "negative capability" - which all Nabokovians must cultivate
anyway ) but I´ve always been intrigued by Nabokov´s project of having
everything under control in his conscious mind yielding complete and free
access to his remembrances. No slip without glitter and glide.

  And yet one of the intriguing aspects of Proust´s theory about memory and his
examples comes from the fact that Proust refers to  an "involuntary memory".
  There is a wonderful essay on Proust written by Samuel Beckett where he was
able to count only six or seven epiphanies in Proust´s entire oeuvre.

  I was wondering if, instead of joining the chuckling scholars, HH was hiding a
disappointment at his not being able to conjure up Annabel Lee as often as he
desired. If his memory, like the Proustian, remained "involuntary" ...

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Donald B. Johnson
    To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:39 PM
    Subject: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?






    ----- Forwarded message from Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com -----
        Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:38 -0500
        From: "Brown, Andrew" <Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com>
    Mike,

    Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
    suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article
    had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
    article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
    prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was
among
    the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

    Andrew Brown






    > ----------
    > From:         Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
    > Reply To:     Vladimir Nabokov Forum
    > Sent:         Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
    > To:   NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
    > Subject:      Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?
    >
    > Dear List,
    >
    > A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
    > wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
    > Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
    > but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
    > that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific Keats
    > passage that H.H. might be referring to?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Mike Donohue
    >
    > ----- End forwarded message -----
    >
    >




    This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
confidential
    or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from
any
    disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.  Please be
aware
    that such actions are prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in
    error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
    helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

    ----- End forwarded message -----





----------------------------------------------------------------------------




    Mike,

    Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that
the article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was among
the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

    Andrew Brown







      ----------
      From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
      Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
      Sent:   Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
      To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      Subject:        Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

      Dear List,

      A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
      wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
      Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
      but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
      that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific Keats
      passage that H.H. might be referring to?

      Thanks,
      Mike Donohue

      ----- End forwarded message -----





          This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.
Please be aware that such actions are prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

----- End forwarded message -----





------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  Jansey,

  It seems to me more that Proust's involuntary memory meant memories that come
unbidden, often unwelcome, more so than specific memories that are sought but
not obtained. Proust's characters are more often engulfed in memories,
overpowered by them. The involuntary action is memory's abundance. But from the
moment Humbert reports Annabel's death in Corfu, he can fairly easily, and
coldbloodedly, proceed without much of a backward glance for her. The passage
in which HH writes his ironic essay is in the period when he also writes his
fleshless (and stillborn) pastiche, and hangs out at the Deux Magot, and
basically lives as a banal left bank cliche. He admits to being an artiste
manque which also supports my idea about the idleness of his essay. The
nympholeptic contact has him in thrall, and he is less pining for the past than
he is muddling toward a future, through a string of desultory adventures, until
the fateful day he winds up in Ramsdale. And there he finds the real thing, of
which Annabel was merely simulacrum.

  Andrew Brown





    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Donald B. Johnson
    To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
    Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 3:50 PM
    Subject: Fwd: Re: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?






    ----- Forwarded message from jansy@aetern.us -----
        Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:15:27 -0300
        From: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
    Reply-To: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello <jansy@aetern.us>
     Subject: Re:      Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

    RE: Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?Andrew,

    I haven´t read any but one of Keats´ letters ( with the much quoted
description
    of "negative capability" - which all Nabokovians must cultivate anyway ) but
    I´ve always been intrigued by Nabokov´s project of having everything under
    control in his conscious mind yielding complete and free access to his
    remembrances. No slip without glitter and glide.

    And yet one of the intriguing aspects of Proust´s theory about memory and
his
    examples comes from the fact that Proust refers to  an "involuntary memory".
    There is a wonderful essay on Proust written by Samuel Beckett where he was
able
    to count only six or seven epiphanies in Proust´s entire oeuvre.

    I was wondering if, instead of joining the chuckling scholars, HH was hiding
a
    disappointment at his not being able to conjure up Annabel Lee as often as
he
    desired. If his memory, like the Proustian, remained "involuntary" ...

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Donald B. Johnson
      To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:39 PM
      Subject: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?






      ----- Forwarded message from Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com -----
          Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:38 -0500
          From: "Brown, Andrew" <Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com>
      Mike,

      Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
      suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article
      had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
      article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN
was
      prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was
among
      the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

      Andrew Brown






      > ----------
      > From:         Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
      > Reply To:     Vladimir Nabokov Forum
      > Sent:         Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
      > To:   NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      > Subject:      Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?
      >
      > Dear List,
      >
      > A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
      > wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
      > Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
      > but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
      > that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific
Keats
      > passage that H.H. might be referring to?
      >
      > Thanks,
      > Mike Donohue
      >
      > ----- End forwarded message -----
      >
      >




      This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
    confidential
      or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from
any
      disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.  Please be
aware
      that such actions are prohibited.  If you have received this transmission
in
      error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
      helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

      ----- End forwarded message -----





  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------




      Mike,

      Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
    suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article
    had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
    article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
    prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was
among
    the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

      Andrew Brown







        ----------
        From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
        Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
        Sent:   Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
        To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
        Subject:        Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

        Dear List,

        A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
        wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
        Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
        but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
        that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific
Keats
        passage that H.H. might be referring to?

        Thanks,
        Mike Donohue

        ----- End forwarded message -----





            This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
    confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
    refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
information.
    Please be aware that such actions are prohibited. If you have received this
    transmission in error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail
to
    helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

    ----- End forwarded message -----





----------------------------------------------------------------------------




    Andrew,

    I haven´t read any but one of Keats´ letters ( with the much quoted
description of "negative capability" - which all Nabokovians must cultivate
anyway ) but I´ve always been intrigued by Nabokov´s project of having
everything under control in his conscious mind yielding complete and free
access to his remembrances. No slip without glitter and glide.

    And yet one of the intriguing aspects of Proust´s theory about memory and
his examples comes from the fact that Proust refers to  an "involuntary
memory".
    There is a wonderful essay on Proust written by Samuel Beckett where he was
able to count only six or seven epiphanies in Proust´s entire oeuvre.

    I was wondering if, instead of joining the chuckling scholars, HH was hiding
a disappointment at his not being able to conjure up Annabel Lee as often as he
desired. If his memory, like the Proustian, remained "involuntary" ...

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Donald B. Johnson
      To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 1:39 PM
      Subject: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?






      ----- Forwarded message from Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com -----
          Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:26:38 -0500
          From: "Brown, Andrew" <Andrew.Brown@bbdodetroit.com>
      Mike,

      Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to
      suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article
      had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that the
      article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN
was
      prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was
among
      the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

      Andrew Brown






      > ----------
      > From:         Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
      > Reply To:     Vladimir Nabokov Forum
      > Sent:         Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
      > To:   NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
      > Subject:      Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?
      >
      > Dear List,
      >
      > A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
      > wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
      > Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
      > but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
      > that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific
Keats
      > passage that H.H. might be referring to?
      >
      > Thanks,
      > Mike Donohue
      >
      > ----- End forwarded message -----
      >
      >




      This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
confidential
      or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from
any
      disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.  Please be
aware
      that such actions are prohibited.  If you have received this transmission
in
      error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
      helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

      ----- End forwarded message -----





--------------------------------------------------------------------------




      Mike,

      Having read Keats's letters and found nothing in those addressed to Bailey
to suggest a Proustian theme, I took Humbert's assertion to mean that his
article had intentionally been in jest. HH notes without disappointment that
the article provoked chuckles from the few scholars who read it. I think VN was
prone to enjoying this sort of humor. Possibly something of the sort was among
the minute idea seeds out of which grew the masterpiece Pale Fire.

      Andrew Brown







        ----------
        From:   Vladimir Nabokov Forum on behalf of Donald B. Johnson
        Reply To:       Vladimir Nabokov Forum
        Sent:   Tuesday, March 15, 2005 9:48 PM
        To:     NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
        Subject:        Spam: Query: Lolita and Keats-Bailey correspondence?

        Dear List,

        A Lolita question: Humbert notes (p. 16 in the Vintage edition) that he
        wrote an article about "The Proustian theme in a letter from Keats to
        Benjamin Bailey." I assume that the letter has something to do with
memory,
        but I'm having a hard time finding any passages in Keats's letters to
Bailey
        that directly deal with memory. Has anyone figured out the specific
Keats
        passage that H.H. might be referring to?

        Thanks,
        Mike Donohue

        ----- End forwarded message -----





            This message and any attachments contain information, which may be
confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.
Please be aware that such actions are prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to
helpdesk@bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.

----- End forwarded message -----