----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: the sterile inventions of late Nabokov
A good, pretty full, article about this book appears in the June 4
Chronicle of Higher Education "Critic at Large" section. It is
entitled "Pecked to Death" by Carlin Romano. He concludes:
Dale Peck is not the worst critic of his generation. He's simply the
worst to have his essays gathered in book form.
Hear, hear.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kenny,
Glenn" <gkenny@hfmus.com>
.>
> ----------------- Message
requiring your approval (37
lines) ------------------
> Hard to
believe The Atlantic is printing such bilge-the revenge of the
> stupid
really has infected almost every branch of literary discourse.
>
>
GK
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Nabokov
Forum
> To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
> Sent: 6/7/04 11:40
PM
> Subject: the sterile inventions of late
Nabokov
>
>
<http://www.theatlantic.com/images/logotop.gif>
>
>
>
Hatchet Jobs,
>
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1565848748/theatlanticmonthA/ref
>
=nosim/> by Dale Peck (New Press). In these essays Peck
rightly
> eviscerates contemporary "bombastic and befuddled" literary
novelists
> who have defined and adhere to "a tradition that has grown
increasingly
> esoteric and exclusionary, falsely intellectual and
alienating to the
> mass of readers." He excoriates the McSweeney's
crowd and "the
> ridiculous dithering of John Barth ... [and] the
reductive cardboard
> constructions of Donald Barthelme," and would
excise from the modern
> canon "nearly all of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo,"
and—while he's at
> it—"the diarrheic flow of words that is Ulysses ...
the incomprehensible
> ramblings of late Faulkner and the sterile
inventions of late Nabokov."
> He correctly maintains that in writing
"for one another rather than some
> more or less common reader," th! ese
writers have created a situation in
> which "the members of the educated
bourgeoisie ... are sick and tired of
> feeling like they've somehow
failed the modern novel." In his meticulous
> attention to diction, his
savage wit, his exact and rollicking prose,
> his fierce devotion to
stylistic and intellectual precision, and—of
> course—his disdain for
pseudo-intellectual flatulence, Peck is Mencken's
> heir (although he's
got to curb his lazy use of expletives). He writes
> that this
collection marks the end of his hatchet jobs. For the sake of
> the
republic of letters, he'd better change his mind.
>
<<logotop.gif>>
--
Sam
Samuel Schuman
Chancellor
The University of Minnesota,
Morris
Morris, MN
56267
schumans@mrs.umn.edu
320-589-6020