I
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: questions for Mr Langridge
Dear Mr Langridge,
I wonder if you would indulge me: what is the
evidence to the contrary regarding my theory that Shade and Kinbote are not
separate entities?
I am only able to come up with are the
following:
1) the obituaries written for Shade as reported by
Kinbote;
2) Kinbote and Shade are present at the same time in many scenes
reported by Kinbote.
The tributes Kinbote quotes as "obituaries" may
actually be newspaper articles regarding the bizarre occurance of a local poet
and professor having suffered a stroke and/or having gone insane and the
subsequent disappearance of the manuscript that he was working on.
Even
Kinbote doesn't report a funeral, isn't that odd?
The only scenes in
which Kinbote and Shade are both present as actual persons are reported by
Kinbote in his commentary, at least one of which is openly addressed to a
doctor. Ditto references to Zembla as a real place. The reference in Shade's
poem is literary.
It is not unusual in multiple personality disorder for
the suppressed personality to be aware of (or to "spy on") the dominant
personality. The dominant personality is usually totally unaware of the presence
of the other (hence periods of blackout). I don't find anything in the novel
that precludes this interpretation.
Why can't Kinbote describe Shade's
house? Why are there no pictures of Samuel and Caroline Shade? Why was there no
funeral? Who was that baby related to Aunt Maud? These questions require
answers.
My main problem with Mr Boyd's solution is that without the
evidence of "The Vane Sisters" he would have no argument. Would it have been
fair of Nabokov to write a novel for an audience that only consisted of those
who had read that story in The Hudson Review and Encounter some years
previously? A story that was not available at the time in any other edition?
That therefore had to have been read, understood and retained in the memory? I
do not find that fair at all! There are references in Pale Fire to Sybil
Vane, but they lead the reader to "The Picture of Dorian Gray" not to an obscure
1952 story.
My secondary problem with Mr Boyd's solution is that it
fails to answer a rather basic question: what is the relationship of Kinbote and
Shade? Surely they are not neighbors and intimate friends as Kinbote would have
us believe. Mr Boyd's solution seems to accept this.
Carolyn Kunin