EDITOR's NOTE. Kurt Johnson is the co-author, with
Steve Coates, of the recent book NABOKOV's BLUES, which provides an assessment
of VN's accomplishments as a lepidopterist.
----- Original Message -----
Several people have asked me to make a
short report on the Nabokov event held at the Harvard Museum of Natural History
(the new entity incorporating the MCZ, Botanical and Mineralogical
museums). I'll do my best to sum it up briefly.
The Harvard Museum is hosting a special
exhibition "Beauty on the Wing: The Double Lives of Butterflies" prepared
by their staff and curated by Dr. Naomi Pierce an expert on blues' relationships
with ants. Dr. Pierce is, among other things, a MacArthur
"genius" Fellow. The "Double Lives" subtitle refers to the emphasis
of the exhibit that the wonder of butterflies goes far beyond their lives
as colorful adults. As Nabokov also knew, they are fascinating in all
their life stages. The exhibit has numerous emphases on
Nabokov. There is a corner dedicated to Nabokov-- with his
notes, the cabinet that contained his vials and dissections, examples of
his specimen trays, and other memorabilia. There are examples
of his publications and display notes about him and his biography.
Along the wall, someone with a great sense of humor has mounted his "Playboy
Bunny Butterfly" (sent by Nabokov to Hugh Heffner) within the logo of the
Harvard Museum of Natural History. The display will run through the
winter and into the spring of 2001.
A special Nabokov event "Nabokov and
The Blues" was hosted on the night of October 24th at the MCZ auditorium with a
reception following in the exhibition area. About 200 people
attended. The program was opened with an introduction by Dr. Naomi
Pierce, introducing Dr. Charles Remington and recounting Dr. Remington's
relationship with Nabokov. Dr. Remington, accompanied to the
event by his wife, then took the podium and recounted memories about his
graduate school days with Nabokov, various graduate students of his own who have
gone on to prominence (including Dr. Pierce and Dr. Robert Michael Pyle,
both speakers that night as well!), and various issues on the "butterfly radar
screen" today, esp. the threatened extinction of the Monarch butterfly in Mexico
and the plight of Nabokov's Karner Blue. Dr. Remington emphasized
the importance of the completion of Nabokov's pioneer work on blues by other
scientists in the 1990's, noting that this allowed for the first full
assessment of Nabokov's contribution to science. He said this
reassessment had answered many of his own questions about Nabokov's work.
He then introduced Dr. Robert Michael Pyle, Dr. Kurt Johnson, and Steve
Coates of The New York Times.
Bob Pyle set the stage by an
introduction to Nabokov, reading from some of his fiction involving butterflies,
and outlining his career and impact in both science and literature.
Steve Coates then offered a half hour slide fest of Nabokov's biography-- with
commentary and anecdotes. Some of his quips got a laugh or two, esp.
the suggestion by the New York Times recently that Nabokov's lepidoptery was a
symptom of Asperger's syndrome, a form of autism. Coates recommended that
all persons interested in Lepidoptera should see a psychiatrist
immediately. There was also some laughter at the "hammy" Halsman photo as
explained by Steve.
There was then a break to
stretch. Kurt Johnson then shared a half hour of slides summarizing
Nabokov's achievement in science, starting with North American butterflies and
habitats and moving on to South American butterflies and habitats.
He emphasized many of the points in the book Nabokov's Blues concerning the
breadth of Nabokov's legacy in science-- particularly the "big science"
questions that Nabokov's blues answer. He noted, as did Dr. Pierce
at the beginning of the program, that the she and her staff at the Harvard
zoology department are now, with the help of Kurt Johnson, Zsolt Balint and Dubi
Benyamini, undertaking a DNA analysis of Nabokov's Latin American blues.
This is quite an undertaking and will write another chapter in the legacy of
Nabokov's science.
Bob Pyle then took the podium to wrap
up the story of Nabokov with readings from Nabokov's Butterflies and from
Nabokov's fiction, including the now famous meeting between John Downey and
Nabokov in the canyon in Utah.
A reception followed and then the major
participants at the event went to supper at a local restaurant.
The next morning, at 11 a.m. Kurt
Johnson was joined by telephone by Brian Boyd from New Zealand for an hour
discussion with Christopher Lydon on NPR's "The Connection"-- about Nabokov and
his butterflies. As noted previously, the audio of this discussion
is available on line at www.theconnection.org. It
was the middle of the night for Brian Boyd but he did fine and managed to never
lose his train of thought. This program was also "blurbed" and
linked at yahoo.com's Literary News on Oct. 27th. Perhaps it has
also been noted in other venues unknown to me at present. The
discussion centered mostly on Nabokov's butterfly imagery and metaphor, his
achievement in science, and his views of evolution, especially
mimicry. I must say that my own "caving in" regarding the comments
of Dr. Remington has since been somewhat diluted by people reminding me that its
just as likely that Nabokov might have understood and embraced population
genetics and still continued his magical view of the world unabated.
Face it, if we're sane at all, we ALL have magical views the world!
I hope this post has been of
interest. It is significant as a "full circle" for Nabokov at
Harvard's MCZ. To prove this one needs only note that Dr. Pierce
said that, back in the fall, Richard Conniff who was reviewing Nabokov's Blues
at The New York Times called her for an opinion. She said she hadn't read
the book and didn't know much about Nabokov, or Nabokov and Harvard.
A few months later, here she is is curating an exhibition and hosting an event
in Nabokov's honor! She's also inquiring about reviewing Nabokov's
Blues at NATURE, the premier scientific magazine where Nabokov's Butterflies was
also recently reviewed. She also noted that prominent review of both
books in SCIENCE is rare, re the space and attention devoted to books
there.
So, the Harvard event did have
historical significance for Nabokov's legacy.
Kurt Johnson