Subject
Re: In defense of Lorrie Moore
From
Date
Body
An honor Nabokov may have declined, merits of the tale on artistic grounds aside,it was readily recognized as derivative and not too subtle, so the the outcry from the list was perhaps mistaken but honorable. The outcry was about defense of a master,and certainly no libel or slander was intended.It could have been heralded as a derivative. Her explanation read somewhat weakly to me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Newhouse <snewhouse9@GMAIL.COM>
To: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 11:52 am
Subject: [NABOKV-L] In defense of Lorrie Moore
Hello all,
Lorrie Moore wrote "Referential" openly as a tribute to Nabokov. Simultaneously, she published "Wings" in The Paris Review's recent 200th issue, inspired by Henry James. She explains this in a Q&A on The New Yorker's site: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/05/this-week-in-fiction-lorrie-moore.html
She also says that she does not intend to write any further "tributes."
What has been called a copy-cat or plagiarism here on Nabokov-L is really just a fairly standard artistic tribute. Just as musicians play the work of another, just as Ulysses was based on the Odyssey, Rent based on La Boheme, and Tolkien's Lord of the Rings based on Der Ring Des Nibelungen, which was based on mythology before that.
Furthermore, Ms. Moore has been one of America's most gifted writers for almost three decades. Her short story collections Self-Help and Birds of America are widely considered to be in the highest echelons of contemporary U.S. writing. Her most recent novel, A Gate at the Stairs, is an extremely impressive work. She is a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books. She is a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In other words, she is no hack.
One may certainly object to Ms. Moore's story on aesthetic grounds if they wish ( I personally found her story a charming reworking of Nabokov's tale and not at all offensive to the original "Signs and Symbols"), but to suggest that the New Yorker is guilty of publishing plagiarized work is absurd, and to accuse Ms. Moore of writing the same is libelous.
Thank you,
Samuel Newhouse
Google Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
Visit AdaOnline
View NSJ Ada Annotations
Temporary L-Soft Search the archive
All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.
Google Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
Visit AdaOnline
View NSJ Ada Annotations
Temporary L-Soft Search the archive
All private editorial communications areread by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/
-----Original Message-----
From: Samuel Newhouse <snewhouse9@GMAIL.COM>
To: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 11:52 am
Subject: [NABOKV-L] In defense of Lorrie Moore
Hello all,
Lorrie Moore wrote "Referential" openly as a tribute to Nabokov. Simultaneously, she published "Wings" in The Paris Review's recent 200th issue, inspired by Henry James. She explains this in a Q&A on The New Yorker's site: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/05/this-week-in-fiction-lorrie-moore.html
She also says that she does not intend to write any further "tributes."
What has been called a copy-cat or plagiarism here on Nabokov-L is really just a fairly standard artistic tribute. Just as musicians play the work of another, just as Ulysses was based on the Odyssey, Rent based on La Boheme, and Tolkien's Lord of the Rings based on Der Ring Des Nibelungen, which was based on mythology before that.
Furthermore, Ms. Moore has been one of America's most gifted writers for almost three decades. Her short story collections Self-Help and Birds of America are widely considered to be in the highest echelons of contemporary U.S. writing. Her most recent novel, A Gate at the Stairs, is an extremely impressive work. She is a regular contributor to the New York Review of Books. She is a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. In other words, she is no hack.
One may certainly object to Ms. Moore's story on aesthetic grounds if they wish ( I personally found her story a charming reworking of Nabokov's tale and not at all offensive to the original "Signs and Symbols"), but to suggest that the New Yorker is guilty of publishing plagiarized work is absurd, and to accuse Ms. Moore of writing the same is libelous.
Thank you,
Samuel Newhouse
Google Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
Visit AdaOnline
View NSJ Ada Annotations
Temporary L-Soft Search the archive
All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.
Google Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
Visit AdaOnline
View NSJ Ada Annotations
Temporary L-Soft Search the archive
All private editorial communications areread by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/