Subject
Notes to Vivian Darkbloom's Notes to Ada (fwd)
From
Date
Body
I was just informed by my email services that all my outgoing messages
from Dec. 1 between 10 and 12:45 were probably lost, so I am resending the
ones which fall into that category. Sorry if these are duplicates, GD
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 10:14:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Galya Diment <galya@u.washington.edu>
To: Nabokov <Nabokv-L@ucsbvm.ucsb.edu>
Subject: Notes to Vivian Darkbloom's Notes to Ada (fwd)
From: Charles Nicol <EJNICOL@root.indstate.edu>
In partial answer to Nolan's question, I refer him to the twenty-five
page article, "Notes to Vivian Darkbloom's Notes to Ada" by J.E.
Rivers and William Walker, in *Nabokov's Fifth Arc*, ed. by Rivers
and myself, Texas 1982. The notes aren't all that straightforward.
And of course Brian Boyd's continuing series of annotations in the
*Nabokovian* shows much more of the sleight-of-hand occasionally
involved in these notes.
Charles Nicol
from Dec. 1 between 10 and 12:45 were probably lost, so I am resending the
ones which fall into that category. Sorry if these are duplicates, GD
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 1997 10:14:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Galya Diment <galya@u.washington.edu>
To: Nabokov <Nabokv-L@ucsbvm.ucsb.edu>
Subject: Notes to Vivian Darkbloom's Notes to Ada (fwd)
From: Charles Nicol <EJNICOL@root.indstate.edu>
In partial answer to Nolan's question, I refer him to the twenty-five
page article, "Notes to Vivian Darkbloom's Notes to Ada" by J.E.
Rivers and William Walker, in *Nabokov's Fifth Arc*, ed. by Rivers
and myself, Texas 1982. The notes aren't all that straightforward.
And of course Brian Boyd's continuing series of annotations in the
*Nabokovian* shows much more of the sleight-of-hand occasionally
involved in these notes.
Charles Nicol