Subject
Re: translation proofs for French LOLITA?
From
Date
Body
Dear Sarah,
Good to know you are still out there. And still at GHs? I'm pretty
sure the French proofs are not at Cornell. Wasn't the copy of ADA that yo
had the one he penciled in his notes for th French translator? Cheers,
Don
D. Barton Johnson
Department of Germanic, Slavic and Semitic Studies
Phelps Hall
University of California at Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Phone and Fax: (805) 687-1825
Home Phone: (805) 682-4618
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 SarahFunke@aol.com wrote:
> This message was originally submitted by SarahFunke@AOL.COM to the NABOKV-L
> list at LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU. If you simply forward it back to the list, using a
> mail command that generates "Resent-" fields (ask your local user support or
> consult the documentation of your mail program if in doubt), it will be
> distributed and the explanations you are now reading will be removed
> automatically. If on the other hand you edit the contributions you receive into
> a digest, you will have to remove this paragraph manually. Finally, you should
> be able to contact the author of this message by using the normal "reply"
> function of your mail program.
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (6 lines) -------------------
> Dear Corrina,
>
> I don't know where the proofs are, but you might try Cornell; I believe they
> have a good deal of related unpublished correspondence. Happy hunting,
>
> Sarah Funke
>
Good to know you are still out there. And still at GHs? I'm pretty
sure the French proofs are not at Cornell. Wasn't the copy of ADA that yo
had the one he penciled in his notes for th French translator? Cheers,
Don
D. Barton Johnson
Department of Germanic, Slavic and Semitic Studies
Phelps Hall
University of California at Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Phone and Fax: (805) 687-1825
Home Phone: (805) 682-4618
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001 SarahFunke@aol.com wrote:
> This message was originally submitted by SarahFunke@AOL.COM to the NABOKV-L
> list at LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU. If you simply forward it back to the list, using a
> mail command that generates "Resent-" fields (ask your local user support or
> consult the documentation of your mail program if in doubt), it will be
> distributed and the explanations you are now reading will be removed
> automatically. If on the other hand you edit the contributions you receive into
> a digest, you will have to remove this paragraph manually. Finally, you should
> be able to contact the author of this message by using the normal "reply"
> function of your mail program.
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (6 lines) -------------------
> Dear Corrina,
>
> I don't know where the proofs are, but you might try Cornell; I believe they
> have a good deal of related unpublished correspondence. Happy hunting,
>
> Sarah Funke
>