Subject
Googling LOLITA
From
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sergej Aksenov" <aksenov@freeshell.org>
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (43
lines) ------------------
> Hi, You can filter your Google results; once your search results are
> displayed, on top of the page there is a link to Preferences, where you
> can set an option to filter out explicit images and content. This I
> thought would get rid of the porn stuff. It did- but the word lolita was
> gone as well (of which google informed me) because it is apparently in the
> list of Google's keywords for sex material.
>
> Setting moderate filtering, produced links to sites selling Gothic Lolita
> attire.
>
> Evidently Lolita has a far from scholarly connotation in the wider world.
>
> I heard a talk a while ago by a genomics scientist who gave an example of
> using google to search for "hairless", with obvious uselss results...
> (he was looking for information on hairless mice having e.g. cancer).
>
> Sergej
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, D. Barton Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello
> > To: D. Barton Johnson
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: Dividas ameacam ...returning to googling clatharate...
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello, Brian Howell and list...
> >
> > Googling brings dangers to those unaware of porn.
> > I tried searching "Lolita skirt" and disaster was in store. When asking
for "Fifties Skirt", it worked, also when writing only "Clathrate", which
revealed oils and chemistry.
> > A search in "Clathrate skirts" was again not very productive. After the
Lolitas, I was sent back to porn, now with clathery-rated bouncy words .
> >
> > Conclusion: VN is ungoogable.
> >
> > Added perplexity: How did this checkered latticed flying "clathrate"
word enter the sex show? Adverstisings ran: "Cothurnated huntsmanship (...)
irradiate CLATHRATE bander" in one address and, in another: " rancidly
latino supermodels CLATHARATE and galangal ..."
> >
> > Jansy Mello
> >
> >
> >
From: "Sergej Aksenov" <aksenov@freeshell.org>
>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (43
lines) ------------------
> Hi, You can filter your Google results; once your search results are
> displayed, on top of the page there is a link to Preferences, where you
> can set an option to filter out explicit images and content. This I
> thought would get rid of the porn stuff. It did- but the word lolita was
> gone as well (of which google informed me) because it is apparently in the
> list of Google's keywords for sex material.
>
> Setting moderate filtering, produced links to sites selling Gothic Lolita
> attire.
>
> Evidently Lolita has a far from scholarly connotation in the wider world.
>
> I heard a talk a while ago by a genomics scientist who gave an example of
> using google to search for "hairless", with obvious uselss results...
> (he was looking for information on hairless mice having e.g. cancer).
>
> Sergej
>
> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, D. Barton Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jansy Berndt de Souza Mello
> > To: D. Barton Johnson
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: Dividas ameacam ...returning to googling clatharate...
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello, Brian Howell and list...
> >
> > Googling brings dangers to those unaware of porn.
> > I tried searching "Lolita skirt" and disaster was in store. When asking
for "Fifties Skirt", it worked, also when writing only "Clathrate", which
revealed oils and chemistry.
> > A search in "Clathrate skirts" was again not very productive. After the
Lolitas, I was sent back to porn, now with clathery-rated bouncy words .
> >
> > Conclusion: VN is ungoogable.
> >
> > Added perplexity: How did this checkered latticed flying "clathrate"
word enter the sex show? Adverstisings ran: "Cothurnated huntsmanship (...)
irradiate CLATHRATE bander" in one address and, in another: " rancidly
latino supermodels CLATHARATE and galangal ..."
> >
> > Jansy Mello
> >
> >
> >