Subject
Pale Fire wiki?
From
Date
Body
I'm glad someone agrees with me! Just to clarify, though,
I do /not/ envision putting the text on line. Instead, the
wiki could comprise articles on various aspects of the book:
"Red and green", "Nabokov's comments on the book", "King
Charles II of England", or whatever people wanted to write.
Don Johnson's recent comments could be quoted. I also
envision--but it wouldn't be up to me to say--a clear
distinction between fact and interpretation, and maybe an
emphasis on fact.
By the way, the text of PF is available and searchable, but not
comfortably readable at length, at Amazon.
Jerry Friedman
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
I do /not/ envision putting the text on line. Instead, the
wiki could comprise articles on various aspects of the book:
"Red and green", "Nabokov's comments on the book", "King
Charles II of England", or whatever people wanted to write.
Don Johnson's recent comments could be quoted. I also
envision--but it wouldn't be up to me to say--a clear
distinction between fact and interpretation, and maybe an
emphasis on fact.
By the way, the text of PF is available and searchable, but not
comfortably readable at length, at Amazon.
Jerry Friedman
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm