Subject
Re: SIGHTINGS
From
Date
Body
In a message dated 18/02/2009 03:26:19 GMT Standard Time, skb@BOOTLE.BIZ
writes:
... With a little ingenuity not God but we humans can do it [derive 1 from 0]
------ end citation -----
Recalling VN’s statement quoted recently by Jansy that ONE is the only real
number, and everything else comes from addition, you may see some
contradictions afoot. Was Kaplan aware of VN’s assertion: VN the poet/wordmaster but
not, on this occasion, the mathematician able to see the beauty of 0 playing the
prime role he assigns to 1? Was VN aware of the Salem Codex? The irony will
escape the many non-mathematicians on our list, I fear.
Stan Kelly-Bootle
Another VN (Von Neumann) derived all the natural numbers (1,2,3,...) from
zero by set theory thus:
1 = {0), 2 = [0, 1}, 3 = {0, 1, 2}, etc.
where {a, b, ...} denotes the set containing a, b, ... .
In other words, 1 is the set containing zero, 2 is the set containing zero
and 1, etc.
Anthony Stadlen
Anthony Stadlen
"Oakleigh"
2A Alexandra Avenue
GB - London N22 7XE
Tel.: +44 (0) 20 8888 6857
Email: stadlen@aol.com
"Existential Psychotherapy & Inner Circle Seminars" at
_http://anthonystadlen.blogspot.com/_ (http://anthonystadlen.blogspot.com/)
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/